Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ana Grubor vs Mary Boyce Deatherage Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grubor vs Deatherage analysis and find out who is favored!
Ana Grubor vs Mary Boyce Deatherage Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Grubor 1 - 0 Deatherage
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grubor has won 40.54% of points on their second serve, while Deatherage has won 43.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grubor, in recent form, has won 55.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Deatherage has won 52.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.03% and 36.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grubor has saved 45.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Deatherage has saved 43.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grubor has won 40.91% of matches played (W/L 18/ 26), with Deatherage winning 38.89% (W/L 7/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grubor has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 27/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 18/ 26). Deatherage has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Grubor has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18), where as Deatherage has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 2/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grubor winning 1 times and Deatherage being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grubor winning 2 and Deatherage winning 0. The last match between Grubor and Deatherage was at the W15 Montreal, 14-03-2024, Second, I.hard with Ana Grubor getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grubor and Deatherage have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grubor winning 0 times and Deatherage 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grubor winning 0, and Deatherage 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grubor has played against opponents with an average rank of 127.64 while Deatherage has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grubor has won 18% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Deatherage has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grubor has converted 53.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Deatherage has converted 38.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
822
Rank
811
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
42% (55-76)
Career Total W/L
42% (10-14)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
33% (5-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ana Grubor vs Mary Boyce Deatherage For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Grubor VS Deatherage
Sportsbook
Offer
Grubor VS Deatherage H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Ana Grubor | Mary Boyce Deatherage |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (43/68) | 69% (38/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (29/43) | 42% (16/38) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 35% (6/17) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (33/55) | 43% (29/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Grubor VS Deatherage H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Ana Grubor
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ana Grubor | Mary Boyce Deatherage |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 33% (5/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 47% (28/32) | 34% (11/21) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (258/260) | 44% (127/163) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 29% (2/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 60% (3/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.09 |
| Aces Total | 21 | 12 |
| DFs per game | 0.45 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 114 | 23 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:9:44 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 85.07 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (805/1323) | 64% (293/456) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (466/805) | 53% (154/293) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (210/518) | 43% (70/162) |
| BPs Won% Total | 53% (87/164) | 39% (19/49) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (589/1272) | 43% (196/458) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 20% (2/8) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (6/8) | 60% (3/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 33% (5/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Ana Grubor Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Kaila Barksdale
Player
Ana Grubor
85%
(
55 of
65)
1st Serve %
70%
(
46 of
66)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
53%
(
29 of
55)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sophie Chang
Player
Ana Grubor
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
10
58%
(
15 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
23 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Teresa Franco Dias
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
2
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
7
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Ana Grubor
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
50%
(
19 of
38)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
9 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
20
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Thamyrys Nicolle Costa Araujo
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Teresa Franco Dias
62%
(
56 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
2
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
8
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
37 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Mboko
Player
Ana Grubor
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Ana Lanisek
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Noka Juric
Player
Ana Grubor
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Mary Boyce Deatherage Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Victoria Hu
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
38 of
52)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Malkia Menguene
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lea Ma
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Ana Grubor
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mary Boyce Deatherage
Player
Sophia Webster
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
79%
(
31 of
39)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emma Andrea Tutoveanu
Player
Mary Boyce Deatherage
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Grubor Vs Deatherage Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Grubor are available here and Deatherage photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
